Article is a grand tour of leftwing oxymorons

American Renaissance is a great, courageous site on the Establishment's hypocrisy and criminality regarding race and ethnicity. I think people of any tribe could find it constructive. One of the many PC-exposing articles linked at AR's treasure-laden homepage just now could not be a better example of the krazy-mixed-up nature of "mainstream" journalism:

European Extremists Set to Make Further Electoral Gains: Report
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2011/09/european_extrem.php

The article's thumbnail summary at AmRen.com is devastatingly ironic:

European Extremists Set to Make Further Electoral Gains: Report, Wall Street Journal; 10 comments
“Extremist” parties promote views that are “widely shared.”

Think about that. What makes an "extremist"? Presumably a person that has a fringe viewpoint radically at variance with the general population. But if such views are "widely shared", are they still extreme?

I guess it's possible, since communism is a dementia shared by scores of millions of ameriKans and embodied by not only the Dummacrat but the Republicon bureaucracies. But the article itself makes bold to label people who don't want globalism and socialism as "populist extremists". That's a major oxymoron, or the moon is made of green cheese!

"Populist"and "populism" are among words most abused by commies. Obviously and on the face of it, definitive populism would consist of concern for the real needs of citizens under the gun from predatory politicians -- or perhaps concern by real people leading real lives (as opposed to the Establishment in their ivory towers and sumptuous Algore estates) about what POLITICIANS are doing to them, and action towards saving themselves from the utopian schemers' intentions.

That's not what modern dictionaries say about it, but in this blog we set the record straight that even Webster's and dictionary.reference.com (an often great resource) get wrong. I speak as a former state chairman of the 1990s Populist Party. To my knowledge, we were the very first political party to demand all the wholesome, rational things that PEOPLE most yearn for, such as abolition of the IRS and income tax: an end to foreign "aid" and foreign war; destruction of "Affirmative Action", minority set-asides, and other forms of "reverse" discrimination; the cleansing of all filth from our cultural life; the reform of election laws that are custom-designed to shore up the two-party duopoly and marginalize "third" parties and independent candidates; etc. etc.etc.

In short, we opposed the malarkey, bulldinky and degeneracy known today as POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. That was and is populism for our time. I don't know much about the original Populist Party of the 1890s, and for all I know the disappointing dictionary definitions of populism (lower case) may be accurate in relation to that epoch, but today the word must and should stand for the values I've traced above.... because otherwise these values don't have an "ism" to cover and summarize them like all the other ideologies out there.

Getting back to the article, please note its insanely upside-down, inside-out nature: everybody knows it's politicians' schemes that are extreme, but it's the ANTIDOTE to them that gets that label!

Never in a million years would the people OR politicians in France, Germany, Canada, US or Australia have called for millions of third-worlders to be imported before the TV age began. NEVER. Destroying a country's borders was and is simply the fastest route to national suicide, but now, gee, it's rated as the best natural thing for every country. You're considered a danger to yourself and others if you oppose national suicide today, and the time is coming when people will be locked up in nuthouses for their political views.

In the mad dialectics of this article, which originated with the Wall Street Journal, the fantastic new populist parties around Europe are "political extremist parties" or PEPs. That's the thanks Hungary gets for forging a new Constitution that actually names the name of Christ. The supposedly conservative Wall Street Journal is dismayed and surprised to find that the masses in Europe are often “deeply pessimistic about their economic prospects.” Zat so? REALLY? How EXTREME can it get? Call out the men in white coats, and bring in a few hundred million or so straitjackets, please!

"Deeply pessimistic about their economic prospects?” What's the matter for them, anyway? Don't they realize that fiat currencies, outsourcing, borderlessness and the surveillance state are the greatest thing that ever happened to them?

Not only that, but these ingrates' gripes ”appear to stem from a belief that immigrants, minority groups and rising cultural diversity are threatening the national culture, community and way of life.”

What a "belief" -- where would you guess they get it? They've got wild imaginations, right?

Well, the Wall Street Journal is the lifeblood of big business, and big business is the embodiment of capitalism, and capitalism is the form of economy you get in a democracy, and that means big business is the very essence of "conservatism" -- right?

That is, if we the people are going to chuck common sense and live by clichés anymore.

/\/.\/\/.