Thursday, February 7, 2013

Are police there to protect? Plus taxes and 666


There's been a spike of news and discussion on the question of exactly what is required of police during crises involving citizens. We have wanted to believe in the goodness of the men (OK, and women) in blue, and I'm grateful for the times they've come to my aid. But are they even required to protect and defend us when we are attacked or violated -- can one assume that much with any certainty?

I've heard for decades right here in South Carolina that this is not the case -- that police are by law only there to apprehend criminals and report their misdeeds. It may sound like the same thing but that ain't necessarily so. One after another lately, our toughest pundits have been demonstrating the fallacy of it. Luke Rudkowski will now demonstrate that the facts can be shockingly, numbingly opposite -- at least in the Orwellian civic hellhole known as New York City. Warning -- nattering "Excedrin headche" music track:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/law-enforcement-corruption--abuse-1/special-report-protected-by-police-dream-on.html
Special Report: Protected by police? Dream on

It's a complicated subject. The police I've dealt with have seemed quite above board most of the time, but lots of people close to me have horror stories of police arrogance, greed and even bestiality. Early upon moving South I was surprised to overhear a policeman at the next table in a restaurant lamenting that police work had drastically changed in his years on the force -- citizens more callous and demanding, offenders more vicious and bold. He later drank himself to death..... right here in Anderson, S.C. How can any mortal being take up a career in law enforcement in NYC?

I don't want to judge the police in this above story too harshly, but it sounds like they were lowdown scum this time. No surprise that the hyper-Orwellian politicians and media of New York have doubled the mightmare of the crime for the victim. I hope he wins, or won, his lawsuit against the officers.

I heard an oddly diverse name when they finally identified the perpetrator -- voila, meet MAKSIM GELLMAN via the excellent site of a mythbusting Catholic spokesman:

http://www.culturewars.com/2011/JewishNazis.htm

He's about halfway down the page. Search "maksim", but only if you're truly ready to see all this put in context with a bang.

Are you shocked -- or offended? I'm sorry, but am merely trying to point out some over-arching patterns in things that almost nobody else will. Major stuff, urgently needs facing. Wasn't expecting it when I searched the killer's name. Thoughts and comments, please. Those that appreciate such blood-and-guts uncensored reality can google WORKING IN THE NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY.

.............We've been talking about W-2 and W-4 forms lately. How 'bout this guy!

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20130206/NEWS06/302060176/666-tax-form-makes-man-quit-job-save-soul?nclick_check=1
666 on tax form makes man quit job to save soul

Was he being hopelessly naive, or hearing a message straight from God that millions of others refuse to hear? In other words, maybe nobody is supposed to either sign or accept any of those forms if this is supposed to be a free country.

/\/.\/\/.  torpenhow@charter.net

No comments: