Another quietly smashing article. "This is not a joke"!

It's not a joke about bureaucrats shuffling papers and killing years by doing (or hiring) studies that are purely make-work: it'[s what bureaucrats do. Two useful words come to mind at times like this -- Kafkaesque and Orwellian. If they're not already in your repertoire, I beg you to add them! WORDS ARE WEAPONS. The enemy weighs every syllable for shades of meaning and political use -- we urgently need to, too: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/kafkaesque?s=t Kaf·ka·esque    [kahf-kuh-esk] Show IPA adjective 1. of, pertaining to, characteristic of, or resembling the literary work of Franz Kafka: the Kafkaesque terror of the endless interrogations. 2. marked by a senseless, disorienting, often menacing complexity: Kafkaesque bureaucracies. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/orwellian?s=t Or·well·i·an    [awr-wel-ee-uhn] Show IPA adjective of, pertaining to, characteristic of, or resembling the literary work of George Orwell or the totalitarian future described in his antiutopian novel 1984 (1949). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orwellian http://www.studentsfororwell.org/ Oh yes, the article. Note that this time, it's ABC that's reporting the Big Brother scandal, one of the topmost "news" chop shops in the world. What are they, conspiracy nuts? /\/.\/\/. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/this-is-not-a-joke-government-issues-study-of-a-study-about-studies/ ay 11, 2012 1:02pm This Is Not a Joke: Government Issues Study of a Study About Studies Email 54 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print The Pentagon was inundated with so many studies in 2010 that it commissioned a study to determine how much it cost to produce all those studies. Now the Government Accountability Office has reviewed the Pentagon’s study and concluded in a report this week that it’s a flop. The study of a study of studies began in 2010 when Defense Secretary Robert Gates complained that his department was “awash in taskings for reports and studies.” He wanted to know how much they cost. Two years later, the Pentagon review is still continuing, which prompted Congress to ask the GAO to look over the Pentagon’s shoulder. What they found lacked military precision. The GAO found only nine studies that had been scrutinized by the Pentagon review, but the military was unable to “readily retrieve documentation” for six of the reports. The Department of Defense’s “approach is not fully consistent with relevant cost estimating best practices and cost accounting standards,” the GAO concluded. In fact, they often did not include items like manpower, the report found. The Pentagon “partially concurs” with the GAO’s report. The cost of the study of the study of the studies was not available from the GAO.