Pope comes out of communist closet

I have chronicled elsewhere the courageous stands for truth and liberty taken by some Catholic priests. Regrettably, I've also had to chronicle the corruption and rot in which the Catholic Church is enmeshed. Most notably, the problem has been popes that write pure socialism in their bulls, encyclicals or whatever and thinly attempt to pass it off as calls for compassion, charity and kum-ba-yah brotherly love.

Pope John Paul II was no exception. Years ago when I was still ignorant enough to darken the door of a Wal-Mart I found myself passing a book department, with JP2's latest highly touted volume in view. Everywhere I randomly turned in it was the same: the rich countries must take what they have and hand it over to the poor ones, and governments must see to it that it comes to pass.

The ultimate case thus far is pure twenty-first century:

Vatican Calls for 'Central World Bank' to Be Set Up
http://www.cnbc.com/id/45013499

With it, I fear we're going to have to accept the fact that the Roman Catholic hierarchy, like most of the more prestigious hierarchies in the entire world, is all about "redistribution of wealth" -- by force, if need be. In a word, it's communist -- and (are you sitting down?) the ironclad policy of the RCC is that all dioceses and parishes go along with what's handed down. The teachings may be an atom bomb against common sense, the U.S. Constitution and Biblical law and economics, but that is as straws in the wind against the weight of ecclesiastical tradition!

Incredibly, the Rat Singer's new tome has a title 100% in keeping with the liberal media's and the Democrat politicians' fondest wishes -- "Towards Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of a Global Public Authority". Has the "new world order" buzzphrase ever been embroidered more exquisitely? Does he have Hillary for speechwriter all of a sudden?

I'm no prophet, but will be everything I've got that the communists in Washington won't be crying about "separation of church and state" in response to this. A Baptist pastor doesn't have the right to point out to you which political candidates stand to do you and your family the most economic damage, but the Singer can utter any preposterosities he likes...... he's the POPE, you see.

If there are any Catholics among you my readers, please rest assured that I only point these things out in an effort to save us all from the communist downfall that ruined Russia, China, and lots of Catholic populations worldwide. Marxism is Marxism, whether expressed through the Communist Manifesto or the above "document". "Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth?" -- St. Paul to the Galatians.

You tell me who's crazier or more evil -- myself in calling for a return to true, Godly modes of free enterprise and responsibility, or the Rat Singer. He's disappointed that the IMF doesn't have the moxie it used to in hosing money all over whatever needs the Bilderberger fat cats imagine in the third world, and wants the UN to take over till a new financial entity can be hatched. Where have we heard this before?

Ah -- those political communists are always the ones that want a gigantic new bureaucracy in response to some crisis. They did not choose to remedy the relatively manageable instability of 18th/19th-century American economics by phasing out paper money -- a device abused in numerous cultures through history -- but rather by setting up the laughably-misnamed "federal reserve". It would in the fullness of time deal not only in trainloads more paper but mostly in THIN AIR! Similarly, when ameriKa was supposedly attacked by Ayrab thugs with box cutters -- miraculously thwarting the third of a billion dollars we were already spending on "defense" -- our response was not to hang the politicians, generals and spooks that allowed it to happen, but to set up an impossibly huge new tribute to Kafka and Orwell and oxymoronically dub it the "Department of Homeland Security"!!!

Homeland Security.... Social Security.... have you noticed that the more the "elite" talk of security, the less of it we actually have? Could that be related to the magic they've worked through their putative War on Poverty and War on Drugs?

I don't think we need another international behemoth dictating policy and channeling working American's wages to third-world dictators in the name of compassion, charity and kum-ba-yah brotherly love. And quite candidly, I think the last thing this world needs is a Pope calling for such a concentrated evil.

WHO ASKED HIM, anyway?

/\/.\/\/.