Filthy Bill Cosby situation produces tasty ironies

A site your mother wouldn't want you to read (but God would) is great at chronicling the gross, shameless hypocrisy of gliberals:

http://www.amren.com/news/2015/01/what-french-free-speech/
French elites who say "I am Charlie" are the first to ban free speech

Much closer to home than the alleged attack on the French satire magazine Charlie Hebdo is the sickening revelations about the ultimate "African American" icon, Bill Cosby. It's bad enough that he's drugged and/or seduced and raped all these women, but don't miss the fact that it's a clear case of vicious race hatred ad work: for over half a century he's enjoyed superstar status. He could have had all the white women he wanted without the above measures, but forcibly degraded them anyway. Ergo, he is a monstrous and genuine racist bent on imagined revenge against whites by the most depraved means necessary.

For 31 years he has been conflated with the "Mr. Family Values" character he played in his eponymous hit series, Dr. Heathcliff Huxtable of New York, NY. TV addicts worldwide, typically not concerning themselves with the actual character of the people playing their favorite characters, have swallowed Cosby hook, line and sinker as virtually synonymous with the brilliant, kindly doctor. (They used to buy medical nostrums hawked by their other beloved "doctor" character figure Robert Young of "Marcus Welby" fame.) The spot quiz as to our character is how we, consumers of first-world pop culture, are reacting to the news that Cosby himself is a feral criminal. Alas, if you're imagining that people everywhere are accepting this harsh reality with clear-headed moral discernment, you're wrong -- but fortunately, I'm here as always to burst your bubble.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/bill-cosby-show-disrupted-by-762416
Bill Cosby Show Disrupted By Chanters: "We Believe The Women"

The fact that there's any difference of opinion here -- two sides of the "issue" -- is a dismal reflection on us,the public. Cosby has no defense -- his only response to the accusations is that of a slily trained change agent, featuring a Hillaryesque "there's no evidence of that" public statement (i.e. no comment) and an approach of "everybody just play it cool and it will blow away" regarding those rightly disrupting his mid-crisis public gigs.

Did he study damage control with Hillary -- or Billary? Has he been studying the old "news" label successfully stuck on the Whitewater scandals, with its endless variations of Travelgate, Templegate, Filegate etc? It is certainly Slick Willy who has (even recently) popularized the "let them speak" approach to being heckled. Time will tell whether Cosby enjoys that level of teflonism.

"Read more," urges the above site, "Bill Cosby Jokes About Sex Scandal During Canadian Stand-Up Show." How many eerie parallels are we going to rack up between him and Slick Willy? The media and professional race hustlers ecstatically crowned Slick "the first black president." Ebony or Jet or similar magazine even published a color photo of the Sexident doctored to make him fully black -- kinky hair and all. More courageous periodicals documented his secret son by a black prostitute, Danny Williams.

The blessed irony here is that it's mostly women who elected Slick both times, even after the whole world gained positive knowledge of his history of forcible rape and flagrant, incessant "sexual harassment"..... but now women appear to be leading the anti-Cosby movement!

Their indignation would be all the more righteous if they'd show a little more consistency. Unquestionably, women led the way in electing the current amoral occupant of the Oval Office, and they'd put Slick back in it in a heartbeat if given a chance.

It's thrilling to see them go after Cosby on correct, sane open-and-shut moral principles. Anybody have a clue why the double standard? Are they "racist" or something?

Say..... Cosby's crimes have to have resulted in numerous pregnancies, but I don't see any of his victims claiming to have conceived by him. What did he do, mop their orifices out with Clorox like the common thugs making frequent headlines these days -- or did he repeatedly write checks to make such problems disappear like Frank Sinatra?

If you're not vomiting from pure revulsion yet, read Kitty Kelley's unauthorized biography of the much-deified crooner, and contemplate all the way through that this is simply how the rich and famous "live."

/\/.\/\/.