It was originally a Newt Gingrich scheme. No surprise that it hit the big time under the Dummacrat label as Hillarycare and fruition as Obamacare -- with the Permanent Regime, party labels are a formality (or a big joke).
What amazes is that pitches by the people bidding to save us from it. I looked in vain for any mention of the usual MacGuffin in this email:
Ready to help Doctors fight Obamacare?Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber just can’t stop lying about Obamacare.
And now he’s refusing to tell us about the millions of dollars we know he made from states and the federal government.
What else are he and the Obama Administration hiding?
As an author of the Obamacare law, Gruber already admitted that he and the Obama White House knew that their health care scheme would never get passed unless they lied to the American people.
So that’s exactly what they did.
They lied about being able to keep your doctor, your health care plan … even your local pharmacist. And now millions of Americans are suffering.
Gruber said their deception worked because of “the stupidity of the American voter.” But in his testimony before Congress, he’s changed his story.
We can’t let him and the Obama White House get away with it!
We are a national organization of concerned doctors who are seeing the damage that Obamacare is doing up close and every day.
That’s why Our Patients First PAC is taking the lead and demanding an end to the lies and an end to the Obamacare cover-up.
We are spending our own money to air this hard-hitting television ad in both Iowa and New Hampshire to make sure that this issue stays right in front of the politicians in Washington and the 2016 Presidential contenders.
Etc. etc. etc. with an embedded video. Then finally, the last sentence: "Together with our doctors across the country, your support will help us replace Obamacare!"
What's wrong with this picture? What does it take for people to start calling to ABOLISH the damnable business? Anybody who does less operates on the same level as the leader Republican presidential sickener, Mitt Romney, or that of the Criminal-in-Chief itself, Obummer.
This "replace it" business is pure, uncut BS on a par with the push to replace or rearrange the "income tax," i.e. tax shifts instead of (for instance) Ron Paul's "REPLACE IT WITH NOTHING" mandate.
The word "radical" isn't so "radical" as it may appear. These definitions are pretty Orwellized, but note that the first one is quite moderate and sensible
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/radical?s=t
...... and the etymology begins
from Late Latin radicalis "of or having roots," from Latin radix (genitive radicis) "root" (see radish ).Meaning "going to the origin, essential" is from 1650s. Radical sign in mathematics is from 1680s.
If you're not radical, maybe you're not rooted? If a solution to a problem isn't radical, is it a solution?
/\/.\/\/.
No comments:
Post a Comment