Well, to what do we owe this honor -- federal politicians taking on an issue like our decidedly un-Constitutional April 15th bloodlettings at the state level? I'm afraid to ask.
http://www.charter.net/news/read.php?rip_id=%3CD9SJFIUG1%40news.ap.org%3E&ps=931
Emboldened GOP wants to abolish state income taxes
What's next -- state politicians muttering about abolishing the IRS? I wish.... talk is cheap! SPEAKING OF WHICH, just in is one of the most sheerly fatuous -- and starkly revelatory -- headlines all month: "Mike Reagan, Rush Limbaugh Blast Romney for Smears on Gingrich". As you sit wondering why nothing ever changes in federal politics regardless of who's in power, observe this neocon rogues gallery:
Mike Reagan -- warmongering hatemonger radio blabbermouth claiming the mantle of his president father -- accurately in way too many ways!
Rush Limbaugh -- total judas-goat, clearly hired by the GOP to endlessly burnish its image and spew its false-dichotomy propaganda. Would it be rude to ask why half the things and people he's promoted over the past 20 years have nothing to do with the real world?
Mitt Romney -- a conservative governor from Taxachusetts, the same witches' wonderland that gave us Teddy Kennedy? Just how dumb do they think we are???!
Newt Gingrich -- for them to waste righteous indignation over THIS wolf in shepherd's clothing is... well, if Newt is a genuine alternative to or opposite of the Dummacrats, maybe the4 moon IS made of green cheese.
It's all theater, don't you see? They're still all going to pile in at Bohemian Grove, but don't google that unless you really want to know the shape we're in.
/\/.\/\/.
Monday, January 30, 2012
Saturday, January 28, 2012
How many more plutocraticians?
Do you ever wonder what it would be like to have a true man of the people for President?
Ain't gonna happen while the only people allowed near the job are worth between 50 and 500 times what we are.
/\/.\/\/.
http://www.charter.net/news/read.php?rip_id=%3CD9SI01HG0%40news.ap.org%3E&ps=1018
Romney would rank among richest presidents ever
By CONNIE CASS Associated Press
(Original Charter teaser title: "Romney twice as rich as last eight presidents combined")
Ain't gonna happen while the only people allowed near the job are worth between 50 and 500 times what we are.
/\/.\/\/.
http://www.charter.net/news/read.php?rip_id=%3CD9SI01HG0%40news.ap.org%3E&ps=1018
Romney would rank among richest presidents ever
By CONNIE CASS Associated Press
(Original Charter teaser title: "Romney twice as rich as last eight presidents combined")
Friday, January 27, 2012
Man bites dog! Phil Donahue and Piers Morgan talk sense
Rumor had it that Phil Donahue was backing Ron Paul. Trust BrasscheckTV to send a file that fills the gap for us who don't have TVs!
Phil Donahue, an American media personality, writer, and film
producer best known as the creator and host of 'The Phil Donahue
Show', was interviewed recently and had some very common sense
arguments against the next war.
"You can hear the drums in the background," says Phil as we listen
to any one of the Presidential candidates on the campaign trail.
"You can't use an anti-war platform to get elected, so maybe that
explains why it's so easy for us to go to war."
Phil's right, but I certainly hope he's wrong...
Video:
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/9142.html
Goodman Green
- Brasscheck
P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.
That's how we grow. Thanks.
================================
Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115
To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:
http://www.aweber.com/z/r/?zAxs7OwctMzsrOwMHGzMtEa0jMyMLOycjJw=
...........Phil is 77 years old, and has spent his entire filthy-rich career putting common sense through the meat grinder as millions watched on their sets at home. Better late than never, though. Notice:
* Dialectically, the implication is that "pacifist" is a dirty word that nobody should want to be called. I've got news for them -- PEACE IS PATRIOTIC, as come to think of it they also imply.
* Discreetly unmentioned by these two card-carrying leftomaniacs is the present most notorious warmonger in entire the world -- Obama. In fact, Phil makes his point with reference to only Republicans. Discreetly unmentioned as he reaches back TWENTY-NINE YEARS through history to refer to the US invasion of Grenada: Slick's Monica war against the former Yugoslavia.
* "It looks like we've become a warrior nation" -- partly with your help, Phil! And overwhelmingly through the influence of your industry.
Forgive me -- I'm thrilled to see two talking head deities chatting this way. I have suffered such anguish seeing them and their ilk wreck civilization all my life that I'm now compulsive about condemning them.
I don't think history would condemn me for it if they for some bizarre reason took notice of this piercing yet far from famous blogger.
War brings safety -- peace is dangerous. One of the many upendings of sanity that REPUBLICAN politicians have brought us in the mad post-9/11 age. "Yeah, 9/11 changed everything," all right -- up is down, right is wrong, war is peace, "The greatest country on earth" is the biggest human terror on it.
/\/.\/\/.
PS Just for fun I just looked up the 15-minute Grenada "war" in Wikipedia. Har, har, the theme cooked up for it was "Operation Urgent Fury". Isn't that cute? Baby babblings can be so endearing.
At the timr I was a rock-ribbed reactionary Repub in my groping for a political position that made some kind of sense. I attempted to defend the 15-minute war to my leftwing boss in the organ business. "Sure," he scoffed, "action maybe have been needed, but that's like going after a mosquito with an elephant gun!"
Letwingers have greatly helped me on my way -- sometimes by being whacko, sometimes via their sanity.
Time for some good news. Here it is from our friend and frequent meeting speaker Steven Yates:
All,
I am pleased to announce the recent publication of my new book, Four Cardinal Errors: Reasons for the Decline of the American Public (Brush Fire Press International).
This book surveys the full sweep of early and recent U.S. history to argue that what was becoming the greatest civilization in human history was hijacked and taken in a specific direction, in accordance with four mistakes we made along the way, the four cardinal errors: (1) Our ancestors failed to secure full economic independence from the British Crown in the 1790s. (2) A generation or so later, our country embraced an educational system steeped in Prussian assumptions (that the individual is owned by the state) instead of American ones (we are owned only by ourselves and our God). (3) We replaced the native Christian traditions of our Founders with a materialist worldview, the product of the Enlightenment and of the need for a mass consumption culture. And (4) We failed to recognize the centrality of the British Fabian Society (founded in 1884) for the subversion of a culture based on self-reliance and enterprise and its replacement by one encouraging collectivism, dependency, and welfare-statism.
By the 1960s-1970s these had begun to dovetail; the past half century reveals the history of the rising of those I call the superelite: a cabal of globalist financiers and Fabians who had begun directing as many nations as they were able to control towards a singular goal--world government, run in accordance with a techno-feudalism in which the individual person would have no rights against government or global corporations. The superelite has been working for over a century through national political and economic elites including the two dominant political parties of America, the Federal Reserve System the founding of which they engineered in 1913, mass media and many other globalist-leaning corporations, diverse organizations including the Council on Foreign Relations, the United Nations, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, the World Economic Forum, and others; through "free trade" agreements such as NAFTA; and through a government-controlled educational system aiming at subservience and conformity.
This is not a "conspiracy theory." It is an account of directed history. By the 2000 decade, this effort was sufficiently accomplished that there was no need to hide any longer (see David Rockefeller Sr.'s Memoirs published in 2002), although as early as 1970, leaders of this cabal were openly writing down and publishing their plans for how they wanted modern civilization to "evolve" (an example is Zbigniew Brzezinski's Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era published in 1970). Hitler, let us recall, also wrote down his intentions in Mein Kampf. Had he been read, believed, and seen for what he was, the history of the 1930s and 1940s might have turned out quite different!
Four Cardinal Errors is intended to present an overview of this history, discuss in stark detail where globalism and Fabianism have brought this country, and evaluate existing strategies for opposing an agenda which, if it comes to full fruition, will almost assuredly mean the continued decline of the United States of America as a world power, not to mention the utter destruction of the American middle class and what little is left of Constitutionally limited government.
Please note: I am willing to speak to your organizations. Simply respond to this email accordingly. I have attached a flier so that you can order copies of Four Cardinal Errors at a discounted rate.
Thank you for reading. Please note: this is a one time emailing; you have not been added to any list. You are receiving this because you are in my address book. If you wish to be removed, please inform me.
Best,
Steven
http://www.amazon.com/Four-Cardinal-Errors-American-Republic/dp/0615516416/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1325479725&sr=1-1
Phil Donahue, an American media personality, writer, and film
producer best known as the creator and host of 'The Phil Donahue
Show', was interviewed recently and had some very common sense
arguments against the next war.
"You can hear the drums in the background," says Phil as we listen
to any one of the Presidential candidates on the campaign trail.
"You can't use an anti-war platform to get elected, so maybe that
explains why it's so easy for us to go to war."
Phil's right, but I certainly hope he's wrong...
Video:
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/9142.html
Goodman Green
- Brasscheck
P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.
That's how we grow. Thanks.
================================
Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115
To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:
http://www.aweber.com/z/r/?zAxs7OwctMzsrOwMHGzMtEa0jMyMLOycjJw=
...........Phil is 77 years old, and has spent his entire filthy-rich career putting common sense through the meat grinder as millions watched on their sets at home. Better late than never, though. Notice:
* Dialectically, the implication is that "pacifist" is a dirty word that nobody should want to be called. I've got news for them -- PEACE IS PATRIOTIC, as come to think of it they also imply.
* Discreetly unmentioned by these two card-carrying leftomaniacs is the present most notorious warmonger in entire the world -- Obama. In fact, Phil makes his point with reference to only Republicans. Discreetly unmentioned as he reaches back TWENTY-NINE YEARS through history to refer to the US invasion of Grenada: Slick's Monica war against the former Yugoslavia.
* "It looks like we've become a warrior nation" -- partly with your help, Phil! And overwhelmingly through the influence of your industry.
Forgive me -- I'm thrilled to see two talking head deities chatting this way. I have suffered such anguish seeing them and their ilk wreck civilization all my life that I'm now compulsive about condemning them.
I don't think history would condemn me for it if they for some bizarre reason took notice of this piercing yet far from famous blogger.
War brings safety -- peace is dangerous. One of the many upendings of sanity that REPUBLICAN politicians have brought us in the mad post-9/11 age. "Yeah, 9/11 changed everything," all right -- up is down, right is wrong, war is peace, "The greatest country on earth" is the biggest human terror on it.
/\/.\/\/.
PS Just for fun I just looked up the 15-minute Grenada "war" in Wikipedia. Har, har, the theme cooked up for it was "Operation Urgent Fury". Isn't that cute? Baby babblings can be so endearing.
At the timr I was a rock-ribbed reactionary Repub in my groping for a political position that made some kind of sense. I attempted to defend the 15-minute war to my leftwing boss in the organ business. "Sure," he scoffed, "action maybe have been needed, but that's like going after a mosquito with an elephant gun!"
Letwingers have greatly helped me on my way -- sometimes by being whacko, sometimes via their sanity.
Time for some good news. Here it is from our friend and frequent meeting speaker Steven Yates:
All,
I am pleased to announce the recent publication of my new book, Four Cardinal Errors: Reasons for the Decline of the American Public (Brush Fire Press International).
This book surveys the full sweep of early and recent U.S. history to argue that what was becoming the greatest civilization in human history was hijacked and taken in a specific direction, in accordance with four mistakes we made along the way, the four cardinal errors: (1) Our ancestors failed to secure full economic independence from the British Crown in the 1790s. (2) A generation or so later, our country embraced an educational system steeped in Prussian assumptions (that the individual is owned by the state) instead of American ones (we are owned only by ourselves and our God). (3) We replaced the native Christian traditions of our Founders with a materialist worldview, the product of the Enlightenment and of the need for a mass consumption culture. And (4) We failed to recognize the centrality of the British Fabian Society (founded in 1884) for the subversion of a culture based on self-reliance and enterprise and its replacement by one encouraging collectivism, dependency, and welfare-statism.
By the 1960s-1970s these had begun to dovetail; the past half century reveals the history of the rising of those I call the superelite: a cabal of globalist financiers and Fabians who had begun directing as many nations as they were able to control towards a singular goal--world government, run in accordance with a techno-feudalism in which the individual person would have no rights against government or global corporations. The superelite has been working for over a century through national political and economic elites including the two dominant political parties of America, the Federal Reserve System the founding of which they engineered in 1913, mass media and many other globalist-leaning corporations, diverse organizations including the Council on Foreign Relations, the United Nations, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, the World Economic Forum, and others; through "free trade" agreements such as NAFTA; and through a government-controlled educational system aiming at subservience and conformity.
This is not a "conspiracy theory." It is an account of directed history. By the 2000 decade, this effort was sufficiently accomplished that there was no need to hide any longer (see David Rockefeller Sr.'s Memoirs published in 2002), although as early as 1970, leaders of this cabal were openly writing down and publishing their plans for how they wanted modern civilization to "evolve" (an example is Zbigniew Brzezinski's Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era published in 1970). Hitler, let us recall, also wrote down his intentions in Mein Kampf. Had he been read, believed, and seen for what he was, the history of the 1930s and 1940s might have turned out quite different!
Four Cardinal Errors is intended to present an overview of this history, discuss in stark detail where globalism and Fabianism have brought this country, and evaluate existing strategies for opposing an agenda which, if it comes to full fruition, will almost assuredly mean the continued decline of the United States of America as a world power, not to mention the utter destruction of the American middle class and what little is left of Constitutionally limited government.
Please note: I am willing to speak to your organizations. Simply respond to this email accordingly. I have attached a flier so that you can order copies of Four Cardinal Errors at a discounted rate.
Thank you for reading. Please note: this is a one time emailing; you have not been added to any list. You are receiving this because you are in my address book. If you wish to be removed, please inform me.
Best,
Steven
http://www.amazon.com/Four-Cardinal-Errors-American-Republic/dp/0615516416/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1325479725&sr=1-1
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Newt, the flaming liar and repellent conman; "Feds, military owe $3.4B in unpaid taxes"
It would probably be safe to say that every word Newt utters is a fraud, because even if he accidentally tells the truth about something, it's only because it will be to his selfish personal benefit. Thus he's a crashing bore -- but there's something enjoyable about watching neocon blowhards like him trip themselves up:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/289159/gingrich-and-reagan-elliott-abrams
Gingrich and Reagan
In the 1980s, the candidate repeatedly insulted the president.
The bizarre surprise this time is the author of the piece. Elliott Abrams will never be one of our favorite people
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliott_Abrams
.......because it's a little hard to respect anybody so central to the Iran-Contra affair, much less a figure in on the absolutely treasonous, conspiratorial monstrosity known as Project for a New American Century.
I'm a part-time admirer of President Reagan's, but dream with me how wonderful it could have been if he'd gone after the communists running Washington and striking deals with the Russkies all those years!
.......Now here's an intriguing page. It (speaking of serial husband Newt) sums up a case that is urgently needed, 100% relevant to today's doings, and so politically incorrect that the left shoe is now firmly on the right foot!
http://networkedblogs.com/t1XID
Clinton Sex Scandal Now GOP "Redemption" Mantle
The way politicians abuse the Bible and its holiest precepts is despicable. Does anybody remember that Slick Willy, following on the heathen FDR's "new deal" motto and similar, started off his reign of terror under a pious rubric of "new covenant"? What a lovely turn of phrase.... where did Slick and Algore steal it? Oh, yes, it's John 13:34, Christ's words at the Last Supper! If Republicans are really trying to prettify this slimy green newt creature with the word "redemption", there's nothing more sheerly vulgar.
I don't even know how it could be more asinine -- "Christians practice redemption" is a motto barely semantic. Christians don't practice redemption -- God does, through his Son's atoning work on the cross. I think it's pseudo-conservatives' "post-Christian" way of trying to say "Christians practice forgiveness," but that would only work if the forgiven sinner has foresworn his sin, renounced it and done everything possible to put things right.
While we're on word studies and I'm just kind of letting loose here, an thought about a headline which came in today:
After Three Years, It's Time to Admit President Obama Has Failed
Laid bare there is one of my main peeves of them all: the unwillingness of people to call any public figure corrupt or maybe even poisonous. "Obama has failed"? Here are a few verbs that would fill that slot far more truthfully: OBAMA HAS...
refused defied aggravated disgraced lied cheated featherbedded conned perpetrated slandered libeled betrayed stonewalled
How about LIED, at least? Surely we all have the moral courage to say he's lied? That should be so much easier, more popular and "safe for work". But where is anybody saying so in the hearing of any audience? HOW MENDACIOUS DOES IT ALL HAVE TO GET?
You only live once. Please -- be the first. Say it. Wherever you go.
About those govt workers and their sticky fingers:
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=41&sid=2720349
/\/.\/\/.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/289159/gingrich-and-reagan-elliott-abrams
Gingrich and Reagan
In the 1980s, the candidate repeatedly insulted the president.
The bizarre surprise this time is the author of the piece. Elliott Abrams will never be one of our favorite people
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliott_Abrams
.......because it's a little hard to respect anybody so central to the Iran-Contra affair, much less a figure in on the absolutely treasonous, conspiratorial monstrosity known as Project for a New American Century.
I'm a part-time admirer of President Reagan's, but dream with me how wonderful it could have been if he'd gone after the communists running Washington and striking deals with the Russkies all those years!
.......Now here's an intriguing page. It (speaking of serial husband Newt) sums up a case that is urgently needed, 100% relevant to today's doings, and so politically incorrect that the left shoe is now firmly on the right foot!
http://networkedblogs.com/t1XID
Clinton Sex Scandal Now GOP "Redemption" Mantle
The way politicians abuse the Bible and its holiest precepts is despicable. Does anybody remember that Slick Willy, following on the heathen FDR's "new deal" motto and similar, started off his reign of terror under a pious rubric of "new covenant"? What a lovely turn of phrase.... where did Slick and Algore steal it? Oh, yes, it's John 13:34, Christ's words at the Last Supper! If Republicans are really trying to prettify this slimy green newt creature with the word "redemption", there's nothing more sheerly vulgar.
I don't even know how it could be more asinine -- "Christians practice redemption" is a motto barely semantic. Christians don't practice redemption -- God does, through his Son's atoning work on the cross. I think it's pseudo-conservatives' "post-Christian" way of trying to say "Christians practice forgiveness," but that would only work if the forgiven sinner has foresworn his sin, renounced it and done everything possible to put things right.
While we're on word studies and I'm just kind of letting loose here, an thought about a headline which came in today:
After Three Years, It's Time to Admit President Obama Has Failed
Laid bare there is one of my main peeves of them all: the unwillingness of people to call any public figure corrupt or maybe even poisonous. "Obama has failed"? Here are a few verbs that would fill that slot far more truthfully: OBAMA HAS...
refused defied aggravated disgraced lied cheated featherbedded conned perpetrated slandered libeled betrayed stonewalled
How about LIED, at least? Surely we all have the moral courage to say he's lied? That should be so much easier, more popular and "safe for work". But where is anybody saying so in the hearing of any audience? HOW MENDACIOUS DOES IT ALL HAVE TO GET?
You only live once. Please -- be the first. Say it. Wherever you go.
About those govt workers and their sticky fingers:
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=41&sid=2720349
/\/.\/\/.
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
"Romney admits he wont end Obamacare" and other neocon shockers
It was so disappointing to see George W. Bush elected on sham promises of giving normal healthy people everything they want... with him and many of us knowing he didn't mean a word of it. And it was so disappointing to see him re-elected after doing things even his radical communist father warned would be disastrous (they were).
It was extremely disappointing to see a glorified nobody with an alien name and agenda get elected Prez three years ago.... after the heartbreaking failure of ameriKa, a supposed bastion of arch-conservatism, fail to even assure Ron Paul of the Republican nomination!
But what is really more exasperating than anything is to see Republicans AND conservatives go running after empty suits AGAIN like Romney, Gingrich and Santorum, idolizing and idealizing them, everybody giddily glorifying their main personal heart-throb among them as if they'd never been made idiots of by a Republican prostitician before.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/romney-admits-he-wont-end-obamacare/
Romney Admits He Won’t End ObamaCare
As you view the above-linked video, bear in mind that Gingrich has been one of the (?) people working hardest for an Obama-style health scheme for many years. Romney is playing Mr. Nicey-Nicey Wimp while Gingrich is all bluster, a motor-mouthed blowhard with an ego the size of Alpha Centauri... but the bottom line with these creeps is always to leave the Soviet Socialist status quo in place once they take office. I ask you, what further proof could one ask that we are simply caught in a pincer movement known as "the two major parties"?
The above lousy news got to me via http://anunews.net/. I can't recommend that politically incorrect page highly enough! Other headlines there at the moment include Aspiring Dictator-in-Chief Mitt Romney Says He Would Sign the NDAA and How to Avoid Voting For a Globalist Puppet (shows supposed arch-rivals Newt and Mit laughing hysterically at us).
At bottom of this installment I've pasted a knockout article on Newt's real history and agenda. Sorry about the formatting -- like most things digital in my life, blogger.com has lost some major marbles on me.
Now for a literally smashing short video on the other main joker still playing the farce -- Rick Santorum:
http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/campaign-2012/rick-santorum-has-never-heard-of-america.html
The bad news is all of the above. The good news is that so far, in spite of the System's hatred of all patriots (not least the brilliant Judge Napolitano), we're all still at our posts, dishing the truth and deflating the lies every day.... and there's really not much they can do about it.
Think Ron Paul. Vote Ron Paul!
/\/.\/\/.
KILLER NEWT
January 25, 2012 by Bob Livingston
Apparently, Newt Gingrich never learned the Mark Twain adage: “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.”
Fresh off his win in South Carolina — in which the State’s Republican voters expressed their preference for a guy who can play a crowd with a planned, made-for-TV sound bite over a person of substance — Gingrich went into full Gingrich mode and started talking off the top of his head again. It always gets him in trouble.
This time, he just flat out lied.
Trying to reinforce his conservative bona fides, Gingrich intimated he was a Barry Goldwater/Ronald Reagan conservative. “I went to a Goldwater organizing session in 1964. I met with Ronald Reagan for the first time in 1974. I worked with Jack Kemp, and Art Laffer and others to develop supply side economics in the late ’70s. I helped Governor Reagan become President Reagan. I helped pass the Reagan economic program and worked with the National Security Council on issues including the collapse of the Soviet Empire,” he told NBC News’ Brian Williams during the GOP debate in Tampa Monday night.
Gingrich is trying hard to “prove” he’s a conservative. It would be a difficult slog if people paid attention to reality and substance rather than fluff and propaganda. Unfortunately, most Republican voters are treating the nomination process like another episode of “American Idol” or “Dancing With the Stars.”
Gingrich has supported cap and trade, individual mandates, bailouts, TARP and gun control. He believes the USA Patriot Act is good legislation. He said he would have voted for the recently passed, Constitution-killing National Defense Authorization Act, which allows the government to arrest and detain Americans on U.S. soil and hold them indefinitely without charges or trial.
On numerous occasions, Gingrich has called Franklin Delano Roosevelt his favorite President of the 20th Century, and has said FDR was the greatest President. This is the same FDR whose New Deal policies both deepened and prolonged the Great Depression, who confiscated private property (including individually owned gold), redistributed wealth, raised taxes on businesses to more than 90 percent, conducted illegal wiretaps, tried to shut down opposition newspapers, used government make-work programs to finance and work for his campaigns, illegally interned 110,000 Japanese Americans, gave special benefits to labor unions, destroyed food while Americans starved, let Communists infiltrate his Administration and made a deal with Joseph Stalin that left millions of Eastern Europeans to suffer and die under Communism.
A Goldwater/Reagan Republican? Hardly.
( Gingrich is a leftist, progressive, neocon Rockefeller Republican by his own admission; see here and here). If elected, he will govern as such.
It was extremely disappointing to see a glorified nobody with an alien name and agenda get elected Prez three years ago.... after the heartbreaking failure of ameriKa, a supposed bastion of arch-conservatism, fail to even assure Ron Paul of the Republican nomination!
But what is really more exasperating than anything is to see Republicans AND conservatives go running after empty suits AGAIN like Romney, Gingrich and Santorum, idolizing and idealizing them, everybody giddily glorifying their main personal heart-throb among them as if they'd never been made idiots of by a Republican prostitician before.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/romney-admits-he-wont-end-obamacare/
Romney Admits He Won’t End ObamaCare
As you view the above-linked video, bear in mind that Gingrich has been one of the (?) people working hardest for an Obama-style health scheme for many years. Romney is playing Mr. Nicey-Nicey Wimp while Gingrich is all bluster, a motor-mouthed blowhard with an ego the size of Alpha Centauri... but the bottom line with these creeps is always to leave the Soviet Socialist status quo in place once they take office. I ask you, what further proof could one ask that we are simply caught in a pincer movement known as "the two major parties"?
The above lousy news got to me via http://anunews.net/. I can't recommend that politically incorrect page highly enough! Other headlines there at the moment include Aspiring Dictator-in-Chief Mitt Romney Says He Would Sign the NDAA and How to Avoid Voting For a Globalist Puppet (shows supposed arch-rivals Newt and Mit laughing hysterically at us).
At bottom of this installment I've pasted a knockout article on Newt's real history and agenda. Sorry about the formatting -- like most things digital in my life, blogger.com has lost some major marbles on me.
Now for a literally smashing short video on the other main joker still playing the farce -- Rick Santorum:
http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/campaign-2012/rick-santorum-has-never-heard-of-america.html
The bad news is all of the above. The good news is that so far, in spite of the System's hatred of all patriots (not least the brilliant Judge Napolitano), we're all still at our posts, dishing the truth and deflating the lies every day.... and there's really not much they can do about it.
Think Ron Paul. Vote Ron Paul!
/\/.\/\/.
KILLER NEWT
January 25, 2012 by Bob Livingston
Apparently, Newt Gingrich never learned the Mark Twain adage: “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.”
Fresh off his win in South Carolina — in which the State’s Republican voters expressed their preference for a guy who can play a crowd with a planned, made-for-TV sound bite over a person of substance — Gingrich went into full Gingrich mode and started talking off the top of his head again. It always gets him in trouble.
This time, he just flat out lied.
Trying to reinforce his conservative bona fides, Gingrich intimated he was a Barry Goldwater/Ronald Reagan conservative. “I went to a Goldwater organizing session in 1964. I met with Ronald Reagan for the first time in 1974. I worked with Jack Kemp, and Art Laffer and others to develop supply side economics in the late ’70s. I helped Governor Reagan become President Reagan. I helped pass the Reagan economic program and worked with the National Security Council on issues including the collapse of the Soviet Empire,” he told NBC News’ Brian Williams during the GOP debate in Tampa Monday night.
Gingrich is trying hard to “prove” he’s a conservative. It would be a difficult slog if people paid attention to reality and substance rather than fluff and propaganda. Unfortunately, most Republican voters are treating the nomination process like another episode of “American Idol” or “Dancing With the Stars.”
Gingrich has supported cap and trade, individual mandates, bailouts, TARP and gun control. He believes the USA Patriot Act is good legislation. He said he would have voted for the recently passed, Constitution-killing National Defense Authorization Act, which allows the government to arrest and detain Americans on U.S. soil and hold them indefinitely without charges or trial.
On numerous occasions, Gingrich has called Franklin Delano Roosevelt his favorite President of the 20th Century, and has said FDR was the greatest President. This is the same FDR whose New Deal policies both deepened and prolonged the Great Depression, who confiscated private property (including individually owned gold), redistributed wealth, raised taxes on businesses to more than 90 percent, conducted illegal wiretaps, tried to shut down opposition newspapers, used government make-work programs to finance and work for his campaigns, illegally interned 110,000 Japanese Americans, gave special benefits to labor unions, destroyed food while Americans starved, let Communists infiltrate his Administration and made a deal with Joseph Stalin that left millions of Eastern Europeans to suffer and die under Communism.
A Goldwater/Reagan Republican? Hardly.
( Gingrich is a leftist, progressive, neocon Rockefeller Republican by his own admission; see here and here). If elected, he will govern as such.
Monday, January 23, 2012
The birth certificate back in the news
Oh, Mr. Pezidential Legal Team -- what you said!
http://patriotupdate.com/17556/judge-whacks-obama-in-eligibility-case
Help us out here. Surely you didn't really say “Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates.” Didn't they ever tell you? The fedgov is the creation of the states, ergo they own and control it. But what really concerns me is your contempt for the citizens and their concerns.
Thank God for Southern states. More often than not, any actual progress that occurs comes from down hyah. I'm so proud of this fact I even bust my buttons just to see a Southern States garden supply store when it happens!
...........This article doesn't contain anything earthshaking
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/carney-dodges-obamas-college-transcripts/
White House dodges Obama's college transcripts
Evades question with comment about tax documents
...........but it's always good to see Les Kinsolving in action. An Episcopal minister as well as multi-media star, he has repeatedly reported to press conferences to ask top-level stuffed shirts the questions they least want to hear!
The pezidential mouthpieces simply affect a dismissive, haughty tone when inconvenient truths are brought up. Notice how the White House shill dances all around this major issue and then -- talk about Freudian slips! -- says “I can’t tell you why somebody believes, despite all preponderance of the evidence, that the president was born … uhm … in … uhh, uhh … was born here and not somewhere else" (emphasis added).
Wouldn't you say that so much anxiety in being confronted with a subject is quite an answer itself? "Certification of live birth," my eye.
That reminds me of something.... a friend boasted having a bottle of the extremely rare (and even controversial) variety of booze known as absinthe. I asked to see it, and the label did a diabolically clever job of hinting that the green stuff inside was genuine. It boasted of the product having "flavor to rival the best absinthe brewing traditions" etc. yet managed never to either confirm or deny that that's what the product actually was. It was my unhappy duty to point out to him that the bottle was prominently labeled ABSENTE, which actually means "absent" in the drink's native French tongue.
Do you suppose its creators were retirees from the Presidential flack staff?
Journalist Kinsolving crumples like all demon-possessed neocons further down in the above article when the subject turns to those Marines peeing on Taliban combatants they've just killed. I'm sorry to disagree with 90% of the supposed conservatives in ameriKa, but that is the classic behaviour of conquerors -- not liberators. Well, what do you want from a site (WorldNetDaily) run by the son of Mideasterners whose fondest wish is for ameriKa to kill a much of the Mideast as possible?
Joe Farah is his name.
............Have you heard the big news? The ability to debate with great charisma is now the only requirement to get the Republican nomination. I don't know where this particular meme came from, but it's been parroted for weeks throughout Republican circles, and now..... "Two strong debate performances, including an applause-getting smackdown confrontation with a debate moderator over the speaker’s ex-wife’s accusations, powered Gingrich’s primary win"!!!
http://patriotupdate.com/articles/evangelicals-swayed-vote-for-newt-in-sc
Evangelicals Swayed Vote for Newt in SC
>Gasp< -- wait a minute, do you suppose there's any chance that this "debating skills" business is nothing but a trick cooked up by the big-government GOP establishment, and then -- horrors! -- repeated ad nauseam by the leftwing media in hopes of causing a self-fulfilling prophecy?
That the communist loony-left media love Newt is unmistakeable, at least since he has the distinction of not being Ron Paul. Sunday's Greenville News-Snooze headline was simply IT'S NEWT, in a huge font size normally reserved for massive, world-changing developments. Apparently they're on a first-name basis, Newt and that dirty rag. They belong together considering that beneath his blustery, innately meaningless and empty exterior, he is as communist/loony-left as they come.
Remember, now -- skill in debating is all that matters. Issues don't; your track record in Congress is now less than meaningless; your real agenda can cower in the shadows till you get elected. And as recent decades show, you can commit absolutely any crime you want once you're Pezident, and Republicans will still stand up for you, the commie media will still more than tolerate you, and even Democrats will have the consideration to speak only of lesser matters.
"Evangelicals Swayed Vote for Newt in SC" THANKS FOR NOTHING, fundy fools!!!!
/\/. \/\/.
PS If you've read down this far you're probably ready for this dosage of stuff -- but remember, Barry is only the latest model of deeply racist Commander in Cheat:
http://www.barackobamawebpage.com/barack_obama_race_obsession-01.htm
http://patriotupdate.com/17556/judge-whacks-obama-in-eligibility-case
Help us out here. Surely you didn't really say “Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates.” Didn't they ever tell you? The fedgov is the creation of the states, ergo they own and control it. But what really concerns me is your contempt for the citizens and their concerns.
Thank God for Southern states. More often than not, any actual progress that occurs comes from down hyah. I'm so proud of this fact I even bust my buttons just to see a Southern States garden supply store when it happens!
...........This article doesn't contain anything earthshaking
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/carney-dodges-obamas-college-transcripts/
White House dodges Obama's college transcripts
Evades question with comment about tax documents
...........but it's always good to see Les Kinsolving in action. An Episcopal minister as well as multi-media star, he has repeatedly reported to press conferences to ask top-level stuffed shirts the questions they least want to hear!
The pezidential mouthpieces simply affect a dismissive, haughty tone when inconvenient truths are brought up. Notice how the White House shill dances all around this major issue and then -- talk about Freudian slips! -- says “I can’t tell you why somebody believes, despite all preponderance of the evidence, that the president was born … uhm … in … uhh, uhh … was born here and not somewhere else" (emphasis added).
Wouldn't you say that so much anxiety in being confronted with a subject is quite an answer itself? "Certification of live birth," my eye.
That reminds me of something.... a friend boasted having a bottle of the extremely rare (and even controversial) variety of booze known as absinthe. I asked to see it, and the label did a diabolically clever job of hinting that the green stuff inside was genuine. It boasted of the product having "flavor to rival the best absinthe brewing traditions" etc. yet managed never to either confirm or deny that that's what the product actually was. It was my unhappy duty to point out to him that the bottle was prominently labeled ABSENTE, which actually means "absent" in the drink's native French tongue.
Do you suppose its creators were retirees from the Presidential flack staff?
Journalist Kinsolving crumples like all demon-possessed neocons further down in the above article when the subject turns to those Marines peeing on Taliban combatants they've just killed. I'm sorry to disagree with 90% of the supposed conservatives in ameriKa, but that is the classic behaviour of conquerors -- not liberators. Well, what do you want from a site (WorldNetDaily) run by the son of Mideasterners whose fondest wish is for ameriKa to kill a much of the Mideast as possible?
Joe Farah is his name.
............Have you heard the big news? The ability to debate with great charisma is now the only requirement to get the Republican nomination. I don't know where this particular meme came from, but it's been parroted for weeks throughout Republican circles, and now..... "Two strong debate performances, including an applause-getting smackdown confrontation with a debate moderator over the speaker’s ex-wife’s accusations, powered Gingrich’s primary win"!!!
http://patriotupdate.com/articles/evangelicals-swayed-vote-for-newt-in-sc
Evangelicals Swayed Vote for Newt in SC
>Gasp< -- wait a minute, do you suppose there's any chance that this "debating skills" business is nothing but a trick cooked up by the big-government GOP establishment, and then -- horrors! -- repeated ad nauseam by the leftwing media in hopes of causing a self-fulfilling prophecy?
That the communist loony-left media love Newt is unmistakeable, at least since he has the distinction of not being Ron Paul. Sunday's Greenville News-Snooze headline was simply IT'S NEWT, in a huge font size normally reserved for massive, world-changing developments. Apparently they're on a first-name basis, Newt and that dirty rag. They belong together considering that beneath his blustery, innately meaningless and empty exterior, he is as communist/loony-left as they come.
Remember, now -- skill in debating is all that matters. Issues don't; your track record in Congress is now less than meaningless; your real agenda can cower in the shadows till you get elected. And as recent decades show, you can commit absolutely any crime you want once you're Pezident, and Republicans will still stand up for you, the commie media will still more than tolerate you, and even Democrats will have the consideration to speak only of lesser matters.
"Evangelicals Swayed Vote for Newt in SC" THANKS FOR NOTHING, fundy fools!!!!
/\/. \/\/.
PS If you've read down this far you're probably ready for this dosage of stuff -- but remember, Barry is only the latest model of deeply racist Commander in Cheat:
http://www.barackobamawebpage.com/barack_obama_race_obsession-01.htm
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Great dirt on the media bluenoses
Finally... FINALLY somebody thinks to put the shoe on the other foot!
Media stars are all evangelists. Every comedian, every newscaster, every comedy or drama series star.... they're all engaged in preaching all the time. Even when not shaking the finger at us directly, they're acting out scripts and situations that spell the worldview they passionately, berserkly wish to imprint on us.
The only problem is that that worldview is simply the opposite of everything we, the people, want or embrace. Needless to say, when they mount the pulpit to condemn Ron Paul with the only dirt they've been able to find on him, they're hitting him with the only moral issue they acknowledge: "racism!"
The main ingredient missing from our conservative agendas is DOING TO THEM WHAT THEY DO TO US. Below is a case where some bright person had the idea to simply try and see whether the evangelists from hell measure up to any moral standards at all themselves. The results are way too mild and way too brief, but it's a start.
/\/.\/\/.
http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/01/05/doing-a-background-check-on-cnn/
Doing a Background Check on CNN
Media stars are all evangelists. Every comedian, every newscaster, every comedy or drama series star.... they're all engaged in preaching all the time. Even when not shaking the finger at us directly, they're acting out scripts and situations that spell the worldview they passionately, berserkly wish to imprint on us.
The only problem is that that worldview is simply the opposite of everything we, the people, want or embrace. Needless to say, when they mount the pulpit to condemn Ron Paul with the only dirt they've been able to find on him, they're hitting him with the only moral issue they acknowledge: "racism!"
The main ingredient missing from our conservative agendas is DOING TO THEM WHAT THEY DO TO US. Below is a case where some bright person had the idea to simply try and see whether the evangelists from hell measure up to any moral standards at all themselves. The results are way too mild and way too brief, but it's a start.
/\/.\/\/.
http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/01/05/doing-a-background-check-on-cnn/
Doing a Background Check on CNN
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)